If you have a Canadian company, you are likely familiar with corporate tax reporting. This is a legal document that has specific requirements for corporations. Professional accounting firms can help you prepare and file this document. There are a number of different types of corporate tax returns. A Canadian accounting firm can help you determine which one is appropriate for your particular situation.
Investment company accounting
An investment company is a separate legal entity that holds investments for capital appreciation or current income. It has no other substantive activities, and its assets and liabilities are minimal. Its operating activities include managing and maintaining its investments. This type of company must be accounted for separately from its parent company. Here are some important points to consider when accounting for an investment company.
Canadian corporate accounting for investment companies differ from those for other companies. An investment company is treated differently from a trading company. It will be taxable on the withdrawals made during an accounting period than on the entire amount invested. This distinction is important for many reasons. First, an investment company will not be able to qualify as a micro-entity.
Non-resident corporation
If a non-resident corporation operates in Canada, it must file a tax return. This tax return may be treaty-based or branch-based, and it computes the taxable income of the corporation’s Canadian business. It begins by calculating “book income”, which is defined as income that is derived according to generally accepted accounting principles and business practices.
In addition, non-resident corporations must obtain a Business Number from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to conduct business in Canada. They must also open a separate income tax account, or NEQ, in order to collect tax. However, a non-resident corporation does not need to open a separate income tax account until it first files its first tax return in Canada.
Canadian tax laws require non-resident corporations to file Schedule 91 and Schedule 97. The CRA uses Schedule 91 and 97 to determine the types of income a non-resident corporation earns in Canada. It must also register for a payroll deductions account and report any payments it receives for services provided in Canada.
Canadian corporations may also be subject to a thin capitalization rule. This rule limits the amount of interest a corporation can deduct from income. When a company has more than 50% of its assets owned by non-residents, its interest expense cannot exceed 1.5 times the ratio of its debt to equity. Once these amounts exceed 1.5, interest expenses will be recharacterized as dividends and subject to dividend non-resident withholding tax.
In addition to taxes, non-resident corporations may also have to register for the GST/HST. If they intend to expand operations in Canada, they should know their GST/HST obligations as early as possible. Knowing these obligations can limit their tax opportunities and help limit their tax liability.
IFRS
IFRS for Canadian corporate accounting was introduced to replace Canadian GAAP, the accounting standard that was previously used by the country’s public companies. This change impacted investors and businesses in Canada and altered the financial reporting process in the country. This article examines the changes to Canadian GAAP and IFRS and provides an overview of how the two standards will impact financial reporting.
In Canada, IFRSs are applied to a broader range of entities than in the U.S., and in some cases, they are required for public companies. For example, many Crown Corporations and brokerage firms with a large number of investors are requiring to use IFRSs. There are various stakeholders involved in the development of these standards. A group called the Accounting Standards Oversight Council oversees the AcSB and PSAB, accredits them, and provides input on strategic directions and the performance of both organizations.
Canada also adopted the Accounting Standards for Private Enterprise (ASPE) in 2011. This standard is very similar to IFRS, but is designed specifically for private companies. Compared to IFRS, ASPE is easier to implement and adaptable to the size and nature of a company. As a result, ASPE and IFRS are increasingly used by businesses in Canada.
The transition to IFRS is a positive development for Canada. IFRS is now used in 114 countries, including the United States. While this is a positive development, not all companies have fully adopted IFRS. For example, some of the biggest companies in the Canadian market still use U.S. GAAP, while smaller companies will continue to use Canadian GAAP.
The International Financial Reporting Standards is issued by the London-based Accounting Standards Board and address various aspects of account reporting. These standards were designed to provide a common accounting language and make it easier for businesses to make informed decisions. While IFRS is beneficial to large companies, they are also expensive for small companies. For example, the system might require companies to use an actuary to assess specific assets annually.
Canadian GAAP
Canadian GAAP for corporate accounting is similar to IFRS, but there are some differences. Canadian GAAP follows the same protocols as IFRS, but it also allows for earlier recording of assets, such as the date of trade. In addition, US companies follow slightly different reporting rules for subsidiaries. In Canada, subsidiaries are accounted for using the full consolidation or the equity method.
As a result, it is simpler to apply and less expensive to prepare financial statements under Canadian GAAP than IFRS. However, it has less disclosure requirements than IFRS. Canada has adopted IFRS for certain types of companies, such as government business enterprises and profit-oriented enterprises. However, not-for-profit companies are not required to adopt IFRS. IFRS is dealt with in Part I of the Canadian GAAP Handbook. In an audit opinion, an entity must state whether it prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS or Canadian GAAP.
IFRS requires management to account for financial transactions according to their substance and legal form, whereas Canadian GAAP requires them to be accounted for according to the legal form of the transaction. For example, in IFRS, accountants should account for transactions involving shareholders in the equity portion of the financial statements, while in Canadian GAAP, transactions with shareholders should be accounted for in the income statement. In addition, IFRS and private enterprise GAAP may require that a business capitalize items that it previously expected.
IFRS and Canadian GAAP have their differences in how foreign exchange gains are recognized. The first difference is that Canadian GAAP allows for the recognition of foreign exchange gains upon the reduction of the net investment, whereas U.S. GAAP requires them to be recognized when the investment is sold or substantially liquidated.
Recent Comments